On Monday 13 August 2007 22:39, Pete Theisen wrote: > On Monday 13 August 2007 22:18, Pete Theisen wrote: > > On Monday 13 August 2007 20:45, Stephen the Cook wrote:
Another link: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/la-nina-story.html > > Maybe this: > > http://whqlibdoc.who.int/bulletin/2000/Number%209/78(9)1127-1135.pdf > > > Hi Stephen! > > > > I have a sort of interesting pdf to read: > > > > whqlibdoc.who.int/bulletin/2000/Number%209/78(9)1127-1135.pdf > > > > This may not format as a link, opens directly as a download if I got it > > right. And yes, it may be junk science. > > > > > > The majority of people are going to start questioning why there > > > > aren't any hurricanes even though the great climatologists predicted > > > > a huge many. > > > > > > I thought that hurricane activity and el Niño's were a definite link. > > > This and last year we were not in an el Nino or la Nina. > > > > > > What part of junk science is this? -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
