> Not only PkZip, you also have 7Zip (the one I use) and many others. And > if you want secure transfer, then use secure transfer (sftp, ssh, or > whatever). >
>From the last time I looked into sftp it seemed there was no set standard between ftp Servers for sftp. Everyone I looked at had their own flavor. I use Serv-U-ftp Server, and to use sftp I had to license hteir Voyager ftp Client. I tested with ws-ftp Pro with their sftp, and it would not connect with serv-U-ftp. I could get Voyager to connect, usually, but it also proved unreliable. I nromally create an ftp script file on-the-fly for my remote machinery to send/receive files between their location and my ftp Server. I shell into Command Prompt (DOS) and use that to effect the transfer as opposed to requiring my clients to license ftp client software just for me, when the ftp shell works fine. Of course, ftp Shell will not handle sftp, thus the WinZip with Encryption. I need to Zip the files anyway, so adding the encryption feature just makes sense for my envrionment. Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ricardo Araoz > Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 1:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Windows Genuine Advantage suffers worldwide > outage,problemsgalore > > > mrgmhale wrote: > >> Pkzip had a free one. Why use winzip ? > > > > I use WinZip Pro (v-10.0+) for its true encryption with > compression (64 or > > 128 bit, I use 64 bit),and for its Command Line interface that > can be used > > to automated Zip/Unzip (with or without encryption). WinZip Pro's > > "encryption" is not just a simple password protection feature > that can be > > easily cracked, but a very robust offering of several > encryption techniques. > > Since I send & receive files containing customer and sales data > between my > > ftp server and client machinery, and ftp packets are sent in Clear Text, > > even with standard Zip compression the transfers are vulnerable to being > > snagged by a 3rd party while in transit. By encrypting and > compressing the > > files, even if they are snagged the snagger will never get into > the actual > > usable form of the file contents. This is done not only > because it is the > > right way to treat client data, but because it is now required > by Federal > > law to protect consumer data that is not otherwise publicy available. > > > > Not only PkZip, you also have 7Zip (the one I use) and many others. And > if you want secure transfer, then use secure transfer (sftp, ssh, or > whatever). > > > I do not know if PKZip ever went as far as providing true > encryption with > > their product or not, as once I cut to WinZip for those two features I > > standardized my distributions on that Zip app. Once I > standardized I never > > looked back. > > > > Gil > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allen > >> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 3:34 AM > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Subject: RE: [NF] Windows Genuine Advantage suffers worldwide > >> outage,problemsgalore > >> > >> > >> Pkzip had a free one. Why use winzip ? > >> Allen > >> > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
