Michael Madigan wrote: > Only the terrorists need protection from the Patriot > Act. >
Problem with that is WHO defines 'terrorists'? The govt? Then it's just what I'm saying, you'll need protection. Judges or Congress? Then we go back to the beginning : WHY would you need guns? > > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Derek Kalweit wrote: >>>> Err isn't that what the US Military is there for. >> The right to bear arms was only put up when there >> was no standing military forces in the US. It is out >> of date and should be removed. >>> How about protecting us from the government >> itself? >>> >> How will you protect yourself with a gun against the >> Patriot Act? >> >> _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
