On Aug 29, 2007, at 3:59 PM, John Harvey wrote:
> Yeah, the house ethics committee wouldn't cover up for a fellow
> gangster,
> would they?
Just like every court in your neck of the woods, eh? I'm sure if you
were caught doing something, they'd figure you're just another good
ol' boy and look the other way, right?
> I guess, I should have said he "allegedly". As far as I'm concerned he
> should have been tossed out for that and other such activities.
He was censured, which is the most severe punishment short of
removal. It is then up to the people he represents to not vote for
him if they felt that he had betrayed the public trust.
Apparently you don't care much for the Constitution, except for that
second half of the 2nd Amendment.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
