Not when the undecided vote is the plurality. There is no way to prove global warming.
1. We don't know what the highest average temperature was 10,000, 100,000, or 1,000,000 years ago 2. If we did know, we wouldn't know whether man had anything to do with the increase. Did cavemen cause the end of the iceage with the discovery of fire? --- Derek Kalweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK plurality. > > Secondly, most ways of decision making discount the > 'undecided' or > 'not voting' numbers, making endorsement the clear > majority-- the > exception being 'absolute majority'. > > > -- > Derek > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
