The guilty to a lesser charge concerns me as well.  His orientation 
doesn't concern me, either way or the other.  The page scandal inclusion 
I wasn't aware of and does shed some additional light on things.

Overall, I think that, at the moment, the audio casts a shadow over this 
  whole deal.

::m

Michael Madigan wrote:
> What I can't understand is why did he plead guilty if
> it was all innocent?
> 
> He's been rumored to be a fudgepacker for many years,
> I think he just hit on the wrong guy this time.
> 
> He was suspected in the 1982 page scandal
> 
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=0RntWGPEjoo
> 
> 
> 
> --- "Michael Oke, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Heard the recorded conversation that was made
>> following the Senator's 
>> arrest.  All doesn't sound right to me.
>>
>> ::michael
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Post Messages to: [email protected]
>> Subscription Maintenance:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
>> OT-free version of this list:
>> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
>> Searchable Archive:
>> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
>> This message:
>>
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
>> are the opinions of the author, and do not
>> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
>> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
>> too stupid to see the obvious.
>>
> 
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to