On Sep 10, 2007, at 8:47 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:

> I have now been to three Foxpro conferences: The last Fox-oriented  
> GLGDW,
> DevTeach in Montreal in 2005, and Fox Forward 2007. I enjoyed them all
> thoroughly, and learned much at all of them. But yours was the best.
>
> The reason is because, while the other conferences mostly focused  
> on the
> usual speakers doing the usual presentations--and they were good,  
> and I
> learned from them--this conference focused on the new, the  
> innovative, and
> on reaching out to connect us Fox people with ideas and  
> technologies from
> other domains that we can really use. The event really lived up to the
> name: "Fox Forward".

        That's the best summary of the conference that I have read!

        There was a wonderful energy from everyone I spoke with, and I left  
more energized then ever! I was surprised at the number of people for  
whom this was the first conference that they had ever attended: I'm  
sort of jaded on that front, having gone to over 3 dozen of them in  
the last 15 years, but talking with the folks who had never  
experienced the rush of knowledge and ideas that come from attending  
a conference like FoxForward gave me a great perspective on things.

        I may not have learned as much "new" stuff as these conference  
newbies did, but I certainly recharged my creative batteries just by  
talking to many intelligent people in a short period of time.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to