Ed,
I admit that it SHOULD work no problem, but like Peter I had an isolated
specific problem with _Screen properties which mysteriously seemed to be in
scope then out of scope which is why I recommended the suggested approach. I
know it sounds totally illogical but it was one of those problems that was
easier programmed around than finding out exactly why - and I could
reproduce it so I guess that I could revisit the code and take another look
even though it was with VFP8 not 9.

This problem only ever manifest itself when I added lots and lots of objects
to _Screen - and I mean lots as in several thousand which was for a specific
project using queueing theory. Simply transferring them to a global object
as a parent made the problem go away, with no other changes. I just wonder
how many properties Peter is adding and if it is related but it sounded
familiar.

P.S. Hope your clothes arrived OK.

Dave Crozier

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ed Leafe
Sent: 14 September 2007 12:03
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: Problem with AddProperty

On Sep 14, 2007, at 2:31 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:

> I would suggest simply creating a global object and then adding  
> properties
> to it.
>
> Public oGlobal
> oGlobal=CreateObject("clsGlobal")

        Why create, when one exists already? I've used _SCREEN as a handy  
global that will always be available.

-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com




[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to