>> The reason Pete has a point with the 1s and 0s is that the rich understand >> how to work the system the poor do not
>So the rich *are* more deserving! Not necessarily more deserving, just more equipt to deal with the system. You might say that some welfare chiselers are also equipt to deal with the system... are they more deserving also? I guess it would be the same as pulling somebody off the street and sitting them in front of a computer. They may not know as much as you, so they are not equipped to do the same things that you are. Does that make either one of you more or less deserving? No, you just have different skills. Often, the rich have different skills than the masses and they get paid more for them. OJ always could run better than me, and probably than you. Did that make him a better person or more deserving... not to me at least, yet what he did got more money for him. I guess the quest for justice, at least economically, is just a never ending quest that only finds frustration. >From my point of view, any system powerful enough to put this kind of system >in place is tooooo powerful and by definition would need to be destroyed, or >at least thwarted. We all know where the road paved with good intentions >leads. Larry Miller --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
