On Tuesday 18 September 2007 15:36, Whil Hentzen wrote: > > Go visit the ProLinux for the original thread and this follow-up... > > I'm hard-pressed to see why this is "Linux" and not 'technical but not > fox'. > > Maybe I can get revenge by continuing to reply on NF. /smirk/
Hi Whil! Anything linux is acceptably [NF]. Those who take nasty exception should take their complaints [OT]. That said, I think he was merely referring to there being additional information on this very topic available on ProLinux, -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
