On Sep 30, 2007, at 8:23 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Simply remarkable! Do you see any relief in this coming down the pike
> or is this something we'll all just have to accept as the way it is?
That's just the way it is. The fact that my server rejected 87% of
the mail based on header info such as address verification, etc.,
means that it didn't have to process the entire message in order to
find out it was crap, which is about the best solution you can
expect, given the current SMTP protocol.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
