Hi Dave, A bit of a sidetrack for printing out source code: For Visual Classes/Forms (but also prg's) a rightclick on the View Source Code button: Colored source code. Not exactly the colors-set in the IDE, but it's better than plain black source code.
Also IMO the biggest problem in programming classes in a prg is the lack of intellisense for the 'this' memvar. This naturally can be overcome by the LOCAL This As <thisclass> of <thisfile> but it's more work. Anyone has build an intellisense script for that? Regards, Sietse -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Dave Crozier Verzonden: maandag 1 oktober 2007 16:41 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: RE: PRG vs VCX based classes for non-visual objects >>> Of course printing out (does anyone still do that??) is easier with .prg classes and you do get to see the Whole of the code at once, but you can do this using the document view for both vcx and prg glasses by using #defines in the .prg classes to act as placeholders. Guess it's going to be one of those top/bottom post, spaces/tabs arguments that is never fully resolved! You may have opened a complete bag of worms here Mike. Dave Crozier <<< -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael J. Babcock, MCP Sent: 01 October 2007 15:29 To: [email protected] Subject: PRG vs VCX based classes for non-visual objects (I asked this recently but didn't get a response....vfp9) I thought Bo Durban had changed his GDI+ classes from VCX-based to PRG-based but I couldn't learn the reason why he did so...I thought it had something to do with performance but that didn't seem to make sense since once it's loaded in memory, it should be the same imo. Can someone comment as to why you would want to design a NON-VISUAL class in a VCX (other than preferring the GUI look for seeing the methods/events in dropdowns)? tia, --Michael [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@sw-software.nl ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
