Allen wrote: > I have a feeling I have seen a vcx to prg convertor somewhere. Would that > not be the best of both worlds. >
Allen Were you using a mirror <g> (there IS a PRG to VCX converter but not vice versa AFAIK) ? Paul > Allen > > -----Original Message----- > > Thanks for your comments, Rick et al. I like VCX for VISUAL stuff (hence > the subject of the post) but PRG for non-visual abstraction classes. Also, > something in my mind feels more comfortable about PRG integration with VSS > as opposed to VCX integration with VSS (since text vs. binary files). > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.37/1042 - Release Date: 01/10/2007 > 18:59 > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
