Hi Michael and all,

Sorry for the late answer.

At this link, Bo tell the benefits for converting the VCXs to PRGs.
http://www.codeplex.com/VFPX/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=13848

I performed some tests, and there was a slight increase of speed, specially 
in the library initialization.

The library is really very big, and it contains lots of classes and methods 
that the vast majority of VFP users will never need to use, but they are 
there, available to all of us.

Some people like RIck Strahl have said that they didn't want ot add the 
library to their projects because it was too big.
You can open any of the PRGS and see that you can omit some parts of the 
library that you do not need or use using some simple #DEFINES

Hope this helps

Cesar Chalom


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael J. Babcock, MCP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 11:29 AM
Subject: PRG vs VCX based classes for non-visual objects


> (I asked this recently but didn't get a response....vfp9)
>
> I thought Bo Durban had changed his GDI+ classes from VCX-based to
> PRG-based but I couldn't learn the reason why he did so...I thought it had
> something to do with performance but that didn't seem to make sense since
> once it's loaded in memory, it should be the same imo.
>
> Can someone comment as to why you would want to design a NON-VISUAL class
> in a VCX (other than preferring the GUI look for seeing the methods/events
> in dropdowns)?
>
> tia,
> --Michael
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to