All I know is that the mover sample STILL does not work !!

Paul Newton

John Weller wrote:
> I've seen the bug list that SP2 fixes but does it give any new features?  I
> know there was some talk of .NET functionality.  I've looked at the download
> page but can't see any list of new features.  I'm also concerned that if I
> install it and then make a change to an existing app and distribute the new
> exe without the new run-time libraries it may crash.  Is it worth the risk?
> Comments welcomed.
>
> John Weller
> 01380 723235
> 07976 393631
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Allen
>> Sent: 12 October 2007 10:06
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: VFP Service Pack 2
>>
>>
>> I got it earlier but I am wondering if to put it on. I do have
>> vista clients
>> but only one thank goodness. But the main query is, if I develope in SP2
>> what happens when the new exe goes out to SP1 sites?
>> Anyone done it. I know its only just appeared. :)
>> Allen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Michael Hawksworth
>> Sent: 12 October 2007 09:58
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: VFP Service Pack 2
>>
>>
>>
>> This has now been released.
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.14.8/1064 - Release Date:
>> 11/10/2007
>> 15:09
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to