Shortly after I pinched a nerve at c-6 quite badly I used Dragon v-9, standard version. I found it to be quite capable, getting most of my words correct, leaving very little to mop up after. Far better than versions from 1996-1997. I was running on an AMD 1800 PC with 2Gb RAM that has Outlook (Office 2000), FireFox, Quicken and Quickbooks running continually in the background. Once in a while I light up Word 2000, sometimes Excel 2000. It cohabitated nicely with all that (plus Symantec AntiVirus Corporate 10.0.1).
I was not dissatisfied with the investment I made in it, although the numbness (and pain) has dissapated to the point where I have not used it for a few months (I have also been in California, away from my system quite a lot over the past 3 months). Gil > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Malcolm Greene > Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 11:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [NF] Any experience with Dragon Naturally Speaking 9.0 Standard > orPreferred? > > > Anyone have any experience with the very latest versions of Dragon > Naturally Speaking 9.0 (Standard or Preferred editions)? > > I just received an offer for 50%(?) off these products via: > http://www.nuance.com/talk/ <-- have to use to get savings > > I've tried the built in version of voice recognition that ships with XP > Professional and that seems to work OK (for my voice). > > Wondering if the latest versions of commercial voice recognition > software running on newer 3ghz, 2G+ workstations has improved enough to > take another look at this technology. > > Thanks! > Malcolm > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
