Stephen Russell wrote: > On Nov 19, 2007 4:53 PM, Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Wolfe, Stephen S YA-02 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote: >>> My only post for these thread because discussion is basically futile for >>> the following reasons: >>> >>> Romans 1:18-32 (New International Version) >>> New International Version (NIV) >>> Copyright (c) 1973, 1978, 1984 by International Bible Society >>> >> This would be Paul's ... letter? (epistle - 'epístola' in spanish) to >> the Romans. It is not old testament, nor Christ's word, so I guess it >> would carry the same weight that a document by the current Pope, who >> could be absolutely wrong because he is not talking about doctrine. >> So it would be just opinion. Wouldn't it? >> > > Paul rocked in an Evangelical way. He hit the road repenting his past > and praising Christ for what he was. He presented to the people what > they were doing wrong so they would not follow the footsteps of the > Jews in the book of Kings or Chronicles. He had the guts to go > between Asia, Greece and Rome when being a follower of Christ could > get you killed. Granted that was his job before he saw the light. >
And yet, it is only opinion and not Catholic doctrine. Isn't it? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
