I grabbed a 20 gig PS3 when it came out and had felt bad at the time because
it was missing the USB ports and the wireless. Now I see the new versions
that are missing so much more! I'm not sure that cutting the PS2
compatibility is a good move, as that platform was and still is very much
alive, and honestly, IMHO after a year on the market I can only count a
handful of games for the PS3 that are even close to justifying my purchase.
If it wasn't for the PS2 compatibility I likely ould have sold it long ago.
Okay, I admit it... putting Linux on it was fun. Maybe I could put it back
on and try to run VFP under Linux on the PS3 :) Or would that break some
sort of MS licensing agreement? Tee Hee 

David Smith
Systems Administrator
Doan Family of Dealerships
(585) 352-6600 ext.1730
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 11:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paul and Ed want a new Ford (Sytze de Boer)

David Smith wrote:
> History has repeated itself with Sony and their Playstation Portable.
Not so sure about that either, as a PSP owner. With no interest in watching
pr0n on it I should add! For my money UMD failed because it's slow, it's yet
another proprietary Sony format, you can't buy a UMD burner, and the films
that did get released were the same price as the DVD equivalent except with
lower picture quality and none of the extras. 
They're buggers for doing this. Look at the PS3 - the European version is
way more expensive than in the US, plus they removed the hardware-based PS2
compatibility!


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to