>> > > I thought the point was to acquire Rushmore technology. At the time, as > I heard told (which obviously could be wrong), Fox was superior in speed > to SQL Server and certainly Access, and thus their desire to acquire > that technology into their (slower) databases.
The point was to kill Borland. Rushmore, employees, a database program that worked with more than 2 users.... these were all side benefits. But their primary intent was to kill a competitor that had two desktop database products while they had none. Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
