Yeah, I've been spending a lot of time on the other side (.NET) these
days...

How is the new building working out - looks great from what I've seen on TV
(NHL Centre Ice package and Tivo is a great combination!).  My wife has been
wanting to visit some relatives back in NJ so maybe I'll sneak back one of
these days and check it out in person.  

In looking at it what I wrote would work in a grid, so maybe that is what I
was thinking of.   There must be a way to do it in a listbox though - if you
select multiple items in a listbox only those items change backcolor.

Curious...

Lou


-----Original Message-----
From: Jack Skelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VFP8: Listbox Row Colors

Lou:
Long time no chat...
I tried that but there is no subscript to the ItemBackColor property.
If you issue something like ItemBackColor(2) = rgb(255,0,0) all the rows 
turn red not just row 2.
I know that a grid can alternate row colors with dynamic back color.
I have way too much code in place with the listbox to think about a 
rewrite using a grid.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Regards,

Jack


Lou Syracuse wrote:
> Jack,
> 
> I think I've done something like this before, but it may not have been
with
> a listbox so may be a bit of a WAG.  Plus I have been writing more .NET
code
> that VFP code lately...
> 
> Maybe something like this in the ItemBackColor value:
> =iif(<condition>, rgb(255,255,255), rgb(128,128,128))
> 
> One problem may be finding the right condition, if the control is not
> populated by a table or cursor.
> 
> Hope it works for 'ya.
> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jack Skelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> 
> Good Afternoon All:
> Is there anyway to make the rows of a list box alternate different 
> colors to simulate green bar type paper and keep all the rows enabled?
> I can make the row disabled color green then I can't click on that row 
> to get a more detailed view of the data displayed.
> Thanks!
> Regards,
> 
> Jack Skelley
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed.
> If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the originator of
the message. This footer also confirms that this e-mail message has been
scanned for the presence of computer viruses.
> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifies and with authority, states them to be the
views of Merle Norman Cosmetics or The Nethercutt Collection.
> 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to