Then there's the other thought. Would you rather just ride the plane down to the explosion, or take your chances?
Hmmm, let the plane slow down to 100 or so, drop the altitude to 10k feet and get out tha way! JH -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Wohlrab Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:46 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: VFP 9 Besides, having parachutes in airplanes would not do much as nobody would know how to put it on or even use it or land safely on the ground. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Harvey Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: VFP 9 600 mph at 35k feet - no problemo! JH -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Bourke Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 8:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: VFP 9 Dave Crozier wrote: > Why are there flotation devices under plane seats instead of parachutes? > > Not really feasible to parachute from a jet aircraft especially at that height! [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]@shelbynet.com ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
