Another way the Libs have ruined American. Why wouldn't you punish the adulterer? I guess we're not allowed to make value judgments anymore.
--- MB Software Solutions General Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William Sanders / EFG wrote: > > Mr. B - > > > > If there was infidelity in marriage on her part, > > then the 'financial package' that she 'wants' > could > > be pared back considerably. Talk to your 'lawyer' > > about it. > > > > Regards [Bill] > > > Mr. S - > > Been there, done that already. Without a prenup and > no smoking gun > evidence (i.e., the photos or elicit messages > stating such affair > occurred), the state of PA doesn't care if she was > unfaithful. > > Regards [Michael] > > > > _______________________________________________ > Post Messages to: [email protected] > Subscription Maintenance: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox > OT-free version of this list: > http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech > Searchable Archive: > http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox > This message: > http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, > are the opinions of the author, and do not > constitute legal or medical advice. This statement > is added to the messages for those lawyers who are > too stupid to see the obvious. > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
