He's married to the fact that America sucks. He spent time with the other loons protesting the war. Of course he never spent a second protesting Saddam.
For years the human rights nuts were saying that 500,000 a year were dying as a result of the embargo on Saddam. An embargo placed on him after he invaded Kuwait. So now because Saddam was removed, the embargo was lifted. This should give us 500,000 additional live Iraqis a year. Then add in the estimates that he was killing 100,000 political enemies a year, and you get 600,000 additional live Iraqis. The UN estimate, an Anti-American organization itself estimated about 150,000 deaths. The Americans estimated under 100,000 deaths. Even if you take the George Soros lying-wacko-junk-statistics-publish-before-the-election study of 650,000 deaths since 2003, and subtract it from the other probably-funded-by-George-soros study of 500,000 a year dying from the blockade. You get 1,500,000 million - 650,000 or 850,000 saved Iraqis. Anyway you slice it. More Iraqis are alive now than would have been alive under Saddam. What is clear is that almost 4000 Americans died to save all those Iraqis. I bet there won't be any "American Saved Thousands of Lives" rallies from the unwashed creeps protesting in the streets. --- "Wolfe, Stephen S Civ 6 MDSS/SGSI" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul, why didn't you challenge is math? Is it true > or false? If > 300,000 lives have been saved, is not that > significant? I think you > were the one that side-stepped..., anyway, I'm > coming in late and the > issue has probably been resolved, but I'm wondering > if Mike's math is > correct; I honestly don't know. > > v/r > > > //SIGNED// > > Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF > 6th MDG Data Services Manager > 6th MDG Information System Security Officer > Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul Hill > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 5:10 PM > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: Re: [OT] Anti-American George Soros funded > phony Lancet story > > Typical Michael, sidestepping the question... Is > everyone who > disagrees or questions you Anti-American? > > FYI I demonstrated against this 'war', along with 10 > million other > people on a weekend in 2003. I would rather Saddam > (or his > successors) still be in power. > > On Jan 13, 2008 9:37 PM, Michael Madigan > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I guess you support changing history? That's > > remarkable. I guess real mathematics takes a back > > seat to your Anti-American theology. > > > > And you conveniently forget that Saddam was > killing > > 100,000 political prisoners and civilians a year. > > > > So there are now 300,000 more alive Iraqis than > there > > would have been under Saddam. > > > > But that doesn't fit with your political views, > does > > it? You'd rather have 450,000 dead Iraqis than > > 150,000. > > > > Unbelievable > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Paul Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 13, 2008 6:14 PM, Michael Madigan > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So much for transparency and real science. > > > > > > > > Soros has a special place in Hell reserved for > him > > > > when he assumes room temperature. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3177653.ece > > > > > > Just how is he Anti-American? Because he > disagrees > > > with Mike? > > > > > > Hey, and only 151,000 deaths is OK right? > > -- > Paul > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
