Pete Theisen wrote: > On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:33, Jean Laeremans wrote: >>> On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:51, Jean Laeremans wrote: >>> >>> You keep one of those for snakes in your back yard? My techie guy just >>> loves that particular model, which was featured in an American Rifleman >>> article some time ago. Neither he nor I have one, however. >> Thank god for that. > > Hi Jean! > > A waste of prayer. Would it not be good for Belgium if we were both to buy > one > or more? He has a .22 and may yet buy one of these, I most likely will not. > > I do have the Swiss K1931, which was issued to every Swiss male for many > years. And a Mauser K98, M1 Garrand, a Damascus shotgun, a Marlin .22, a .44 > Charter Bulldog, a Smith model 64 .38, a Taurus PT 92 AR (with four 18-shot > clips) and a Kahr MK9 - this last which I keep in my pocket most of the time. > If I (or he) were going to misuse a gun I (he) would have already done so.
That Kahr would be what your law calls a "concealed weapon"? Isn't it against the law? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
