On Jan 28, 2008 2:43 PM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
>
> > I got a few of these too. At least one of my original messages was
> > replied to by another list member so it did actually make it.
>
> Someone's machine is infected, and the malware is reading your email
> address from Outlook, and trying to send spam in your name to the list
> address. The list software is bouncing that spam back to the
> "originating" address, which is spoofed to be yours.
Are you sure? The bounce contains my original message, not spam.
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: by 10.142.231.5 with SMTP id d5cs130620wfh;
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:05:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.100.216.3 with SMTP id o3mr11021839ang.28.1201496728612;
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <>
Received: from suggs.sensiblesoftware.com (suggs.sensiblesoftware.com
[70.85.96.2])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13si7590134wrl.7.2008.01.27.21.05.27;
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of
suggs.sensiblesoftware.com designates 70.85.96.2 as permitted sender)
client-ip=70.85.96.2;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best
guess record for domain of suggs.sensiblesoftware.com designates
70.85.96.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=
Received: from marge.leafe.com ([66.67.120.94]) by
suggs.sensiblesoftware.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:05:24 -0500
Received: by marge.leafe.com (Postfix)
id 6157D9809A; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:05:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:05:57 -0500 (EST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mail Delivery System)
Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="E1C5C98095.1201496757/marge.leafe.com"
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Return-Path: <>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jan 2008 05:05:24.0500 (UTC)
FILETIME=[63DECD40:01C8616B]
This is a MIME-encapsulated message.
--E1C5C98095.1201496757/marge.leafe.com
Content-Description: Notification
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is the mail system at host marge.leafe.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[email protected]>: mail forwarding loop for [email protected]
--E1C5C98095.1201496757/marge.leafe.com
Content-Description: Delivery report
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: dns; marge.leafe.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: E1C5C98095
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arrival-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:05:56 -0500 (EST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Original-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.4.6
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; mail forwarding loop for [email protected]
--E1C5C98095.1201496757/marge.leafe.com
Content-Description: Undelivered Message
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Received: from smtp-out-46.synserver.de (smtp-out-46.synserver.de
[217.119.50.46])
by marge.leafe.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E1C5C98095
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 00:05:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 30888 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2008 05:05:25 -0000
Received: from exchange.synserver.de [217.119.50.196]
by mx-10.synserver.de with SMTP; 28 Jan 2008 05:05:25 -0000
Received: from mail pickup service by exchange.synserver.de with
Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:15:22 +0100
Received: from smtp-out-46.synserver.de ([217.119.50.226]) by
exchange.synserver.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:22:07 +0100
Received: (qmail 5506 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 14:23:06 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SynServer-Languages: ++en:0 fr:37
X-SynServer-StrangeSender: 0
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SynServer-Mailin-Timestamp: 1201098185
Received: (qmail 5392 invoked by alias); 23 Jan 2008 14:23:05 -0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SynServer-Spamassassin-Matched-Sensitive: 1
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-SynServer-Spamassassin-Hits: 3.6
X-SynServer-SA-BayesUser: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SynServer-SA-Rule-2: BAYES_60 3.5
X-SynServer-SA-Rule-1: RCVD_BY_IP 0.1
X-SynServer-Languages: ++en:0 fr:37
X-SynServer-StrangeSender: 0
X-Envelope-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-SynServer-Priority: normal
X-SynServer-Mailin-Timestamp: 1201098184
Received: (qmail 5296 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jan 2008 14:23:04 -0000
X-SynServer-TrustedSrc: 0
X-SynServer-AuthIP: 70.85.96.2
X-Originating-IP: 70.85.96.2
Received: from suggs.sensiblesoftware.com [70.85.96.2]
by mx-01.synserver.de with SMTP; 23 Jan 2008 14:22:55 -0000
Received: from marge.leafe.com ([66.67.120.94]) by
suggs.sensiblesoftware.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:22:49 -0500
Received: from leafe.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by marge.leafe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6139825B;
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:23:18 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-To: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228])
by marge.leafe.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BF098255
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:23:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id t4so1698519wxc.18
for <[email protected]>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:22:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr4892790wfg.177.1201098167291;
Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.142.231.5 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:22:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:22:47 +0000
From: "Paul Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ProFox Email List" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OT] Nuke Em I Say!
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spambayes-Classification: ham; 0.00
X-BeenThere: [email protected]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ProFox Email List <[email protected]>
List-Id: ProFox Email List <profox.leafe.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: </archives/search>
List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jan 2008 14:22:49.0984 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6EDDE800:01C85DCB]
On Jan 23, 2008 2:21 PM, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 January 2008 09:11, Dave Crozier wrote:
> > "The French have banned Brit border guards at Calais from deploying
> > immigrant-hunting gamma-ray scanners, claiming they breach EU health and
> > safety regulations and can only be used with the intended targets' written
> > permission."
> >
> > Is this not the height of political correctness gone mad?
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/23/gamma_scanner_ban/
> >
> > Personally I'd use full strength Xrays .and then some.
>
> H Dave!
>
> Oh, I think tear gas pumped into the van body would have less collateral
> damage. The 'slim or spic would come out distressed but unharmed and be
> arrested without incident.
>
> When I drove I used to gas my van routinely. Never were any stowaways.
Shame about all those dead livestock though!
--
Paul
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
