Rick

I've got to say I'm dismayed by the "outrage". I've held off going to
SP2 because so much ado was made of it's problems. Well I just
upgraded to it and released a new build of my Visual MaxFrame
Professional based application with the only glitch being a lack of
tooltips in the grid headers. That is a feature none of the users care
about.

So all in all, I'm reasonable happy with SP2.

> No, this would be presenting Microsoft with a threat model. I don't think we 
> need to do this,
> because Microsoft knows the competition better than most companies do. The 
> business approach I am
> suggesting is to identify the killer regression bugs introduced in SP2 that 
> do not have reasonable
> workarounds. Then determine the use cases where the identified bugs are a 
> show stopper with respect
> to adoption. If we can show the limited list of bugs, the reasons why VFP 
> developers can't use the
> product, and how we are minimizing the impact to Microsoft to fix these, then 
> maybe Microsoft can be
> convinced to deliver SP3.
>
> We also have to present the case to show how the community will participate 
> in testing. I personally
> do not think the community really tested SP2 because Microsoft did not hold a 
> formal beta, and those
> who reported issues never received any feedback that the issues were being 
> looked at and fixed if
> appropriate. This combination turned a lot of people off, and now we have to 
> live with the results,
> which stinks.
>

Mike Yearwood


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to