On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>        That seemed pretty obvious to me without the "myth".
>
>        We nuked Japan because we felt that in doing so we would avoid even
> greater casualties by ending the war quickly. The question was: if the
> US is allowed to invoke such reasoning in order to justify nuclear
> attacks against civilians, why shouldn't any other country be allowed
> to use similar reasoning to nuke two US cities?
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your just happy that they dropped one of them on the Catholic Church.

Bad Steve.

Everyone knows that Japan was in bad straights.  They were loosing the air
war over their nation and we were burning 50+ cites in a month.  We were
happy with deciding on Napalm as the explosive of choice for destroying the
cities of Japan.

Hey they live in paper houses don't they?  We were on the killing of any
living thing plan for months so when we dropped a really biggggggg bomb,
that nobody had a clue about, it seemed to fit the plan of action we already
had in place.

I saw a great documentary on the blasts last summer for their anniversary.
It was on PBS and was 2 or 4 hours long.  What interviews with the
survivors.

War is terrible.




-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
---

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to