Gil Hale wrote: > Hmmm... As I see it, until these little efforts by Micro$coff to extort > additional revenue from consumers are made loudly public, and consumers are > educated in mass of viable alternatives, Micro$coff will continue to get > away with their licensing and billing practices. From a pure economic > perspective there is nothing particularly unfair about a consumer "agreeing" > to the onerous terms of the Vista licensing twist. But it sure does not > sound like the "one time machine transfer" license limitation is pointed out > clearly to the consumer. This is the first I heard of it.
I heard a great line last night at a user group meeting: "Marketing is a tax on mediocre products." And everyone knows Microsoft is a great marketing company. Whil _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
