>> Is this an easy way to manage using a local dbf backend versus easily 
>> upsizing to a non-dbf
backend eventually, all with the click of a checkbox in the Advantage 
configuration utility?  That's
what it sounded like to me.  Rick -- you commented....is that the way you 
interpreted it?<<

I have just started to play with it. I am not an expert in the database yet. 
But everything I have
seen and read has me pretty impressed with the product.

It allows you to retain the investment you have in DBF files. No need to write 
conversion code for
upsizing to *any* backend database. If you migrate to the Advantage Database 
Server you can hide the
DBFs (no need for users to have access to the folder anymore) so you now have 
secure files. Since
all the access to the data is done by requesting the results from a server you 
get client/server
benefits with respect to network traffic (as in no indexes to cache locally). 
This also reduces the
corruption of indexes and DBFs close to zero since it is handled on one box and 
one set of
processes. It sure demos easy. <g>

You still have to change your application to be a client/server style (no 
direct table access), but
since a lot of have been using local views for years all we have to do is 
change to a remote view
and the app should be fairly easy to move over. Those that took the straight 
table and XBase route
have a bit more work to do, but that is a trade off and not uncommon when 
moving to client/server. 

The killer thing I am getting out of this product is the ODBC driver is free 
and works with VFP 9
Database Containers. This is going to help out a lot of developers who are 
stuck at VFP 6 DBC levels
and cannot take advantage of the DBC Events, and the new data types added to 
VFP over the last few
releases.

The Advantage Database Server is a price per seat business model which may turn 
some people off the
backend database, but the costs of the licensing is likely cheaper than the 
cost of the upsizing
code if you are not doing SQL Server and using the new Sedna upsizing wizard. I 
think if developers
do a serious cost analysis they will see some interesting possibilities.

Rick
White Light Computing, Inc.

www.whitelightcomputing.com
www.swfox.net
www.rickschummer.com





_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to