On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Jeff Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Direct from the horses mouth: > > "I am positive there is no SQL 2000 on the new server. It must have > backward compatibility for SQL clients and drivers, I just connected to > the database with SQL Query Analyzer for SQL 2000, it's just the > Enterprise Manager from SQL 2000 that does not work with SQL 2005." > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oh, QA usage. I'm not in favor of it when you have SQL 2005 tools at hand. If you don't then it's fine. There are a few little differences between them but it's more in the total control of things that you get different answers, like min value from an nText column and all. But when your doing connections for data make a test run with odbc and say excel. that will steer you right on your conn string usage. -- Stephen Russell Sr. Production Systems Programmer Mimeo.com Memphis TN 901.246-0159 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
