My application is a collection agency program, so the
collector pulls up an account, works it, fills in
stuff, then pulls up another account.  I'm guessing I
should be fine.  Buy.com offers a 14 day money-back
guarantee, so we can use it for a week and if it
doesn't work out, we can return it.

According to what I've read on the Internet, NAS
devices can't be compared directly with file-serving
servers because of all the overhead servers have
besides file-sharing.  Because NAS is file-sharing
only, it can achieve greater throughput with less
horsepower.

If we go ahead on this, I'll post a review.





--- Kevin Cully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I've been using a Buffalo Linkstation (250G) for
> about four years now.
> I have, on occasion, run a VFP EXE off of it and the
> performance is
> acceptable for a lightly used application.  That
> Netgear box is far more
> robust than my Linkstation based on the specs.
> 
> -Kevin
> CULLY Technologies, LLC
> 
> 
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > It looks like it uses a cpu that I've never heard
> of. 
> > I was wondering if this is fast enough for serving
> a
> > foxpro database that really doesn't require super
> > performance?
> > 
> > 
> >
>
http://www.netgear.com/Products/Storage/ReadyNASNVPlus/RND4425.aspx
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive:
> http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
>
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,
> are the opinions of the author, and do not
> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement
> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are
> too stupid to see the obvious.
> 



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to