Bill Arnold wrote: >> I have been running VFP6 and 9 SP1 on Vista SP1 and now SP2 >> without any problems. >> > > > Evidence is that Vista's lack of backwards compatibility caused (at > least) this problem. > Every version of Fox from 2.5 for DOS through 2.6 For Windows through to VFP9 SP1 seems OK for me on Vista. Sorry Bill, but there it is. If they didn't care about backward compatibility they would have removed the Win16 and virtual DOS machine emulation that allows me to run the first two a long time ago, but it's still there in the 32-bit operating systems. It's at least as good as the situation with Apple (to pick another major OS at random), as far as I can see.
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
