I have been around, just busy with lots of other activities. Unfortunately, not enough of them have been programming related or those that have were in some other language.... But I still hang out here to see what's going on.
But MS hasn't made it easy for me in the VFP world although VFPx is looking rather interesting. Take care, Fletcher -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions General Account Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 1:59 PM To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: Current reference for .NET <-> VFP? Fletcher Johnson wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been asked to help some VFP developers who want to learn .NET. For > now, let's skip the comments about why they would want to do such a silly > thing. > > I am looking for a reference that has a list of VFP commands and > corresponding .NET commands. I would prefer one that is current and, where > possible, uses the OOP approach vs. the legacy VB 5x and before commands. > > I know that some were done when .NET first came out, but am trying to find a > source that is as current as possible (one that references .NET 2008 would > be best....) > > I do not need a library that emulates VFP commands or anything that allows > VFP commands to work in .NET. On the other hand, a library of classes that > give functionality that is not available in .NET without programming might > be nice. > > Thanks, > > Fletcher > > Wow....long time no post, Fletcher! Check out Les Pinter's site. He had a concordance at one point for VB6<-->VFP; perhaps he did one for DotNet too. btw, expanding your toolset is never a bad thing. Just go to Monster.com or Dice.com and check out the future...if the tool is not found in a search, then it's probably not worth learning! lol.... [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
