Michael Madigan wrote: > Listen to this nonsense. Some cities have seen a drop > in revenue from red light violations and are > considering turning off the cameras. It seems too > many people are obeying the traffic stops. > > I thought the idea of cameras was to improve safety > and save lives? > > > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23710970/ >
Absolutely strange. They shouldn't rely heavily on the fine dollars for their budgets. I'd say they should keep using them but just "up" the fine to perhaps help make up for the shortfall in revenue. This has the same logical thoughts as letting everyone smoke so that we reduce the population via cigarette-related deaths, or guns for everybody so more people will get shot (and reduce the population boom). Insane. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
