On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Garrett Fitzgerald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the most part, I just use it for mailing lists, and anything > that's so HTML-heavy I can't read it in elm. :-) I do use the labels, > except that I keep Profox in the Inbox, since that's what I started > using it for, and it just didn't look right when I moved it. (Besides, > I hate hitting 'y' to archive the thread when I'm reading by label...) > Some of my labeled messages were indeed in the spam folder: that's > what I noticed first.
I wondered if the labeling might weigh in favor in Google's filtering. Since Ed does such a great job filtering this list, it ought to have a score close to perfect. Sounds like Google needs to adjust their algorithms. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
