But as I said, the article did not say it was a Muslim and not all Turkey is Muslim.
Antalya is a very cosmopolitan area so the attacker who had previously been there could be Christian etc. Where is the prejudice in my statement? -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen Sent: 14 April 2008 12:15 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] Bride for Peace raped and murdered by Muslim in Turkey On Monday 14 April 2008 04:28, Adam Buckland wrote: > Once again Michael makes up the facts to suit his prejudices, the > article doesn't actually say that it was a Muslim who murdered her. > Whilst the majority are, not all Turks are Muslim. Hi Adam! By Achmed, you're right! How could Michael fail to follow YOUR prejudice, rather than his own? Not allowing for a whole 1%!!! "Nominally, 99% of the Turkish population is Muslim[88][89] of whom over 75% belong to the Sunni branch of Islam. A sizeable minority, about over 20% of the Muslim population, is affiliated with the Shi'a Alevi sect,[90] which is also sometimes considered Yazdani." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey#Demographics > Can't we all just get along? > > http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3530754,00.html -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
