On Monday 14 April 2008 08:27, Adam Buckland wrote: > There is no evidence in Michaels article.... base it on what was known > at the time, hindsight is easy.
Hi Adam! Quit wiggling, you're busted. > On Monday 14 April 2008 09:29, Pete Theisen wrote: > > > And I'll add a third point. Since Turkey is predominanty Muslim, why > > > assume MK is not? > > http://www.answers.com/topic/murat-1 > > > > "Murat" as a first name is Turkish. So, 99% chance that Michael called >> it correctly. 1% chance that Adam called it correctly. > And Karatas is Turkish as well . . . The evidence is accumulating . . . > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karata%C5%9F,_%C4%B0zmir -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.com/ _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
