On Apr 24, 2008, at 9:42 AM, David Crooks wrote:
>> Does anyone think it's time to filter out posts based on the
> presence of 'ProFox Digest' in the subject?
>
> Yeah, we need more rules in the free society (service)! YMMV
It's not a new rule; it's the application of an existing rule, namely
the inclusion of [OT] in the subject of off-topic posts.
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
