Ted Roche wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:47 PM, Whil Hentzen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Correction. I'm the world's worst reader.
>>
> 
> I kinda wondered if I didn't understand the question. I was watching
> "Goblet of Fire" so couldn't devote a lot of neurons to it, but "embed
> schema in XML" seemed to yield a bazillion hits. Couldn't figure if
> you were asking something complicated-er..

Well, yes, there are a bazillion hits, but... (1) YOU have The Gift, and 
(2) none of them mentioned FoxPro. VFP's XML formatting requirements are 
just a smidgeon different (the "<VFP Data" or something) - different 
enough to make me stop after a few tries and a dozen beers or so.

For the archives.........

Normal Schema:
--------------

<xml xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; mlns="#CMODataSchema">
<xsd:schema id="CMODataSchema">
             <xsd:element name="cCustomer">

** more stuff **
             </xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
<cCustomer>

** more stuff

VFP's version:
--------------

<xml xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; mlns="#CMODataSchema">
<VFPDataSet>
   <xsd:schema id="CMODataSchema">
             <xsd:element name="cCustomer">

** more stuff **
             </xsd:element>
   </xsd:schema>
   <cCustomer>

** more stuff

</VFPDataSet>

in the hopes that this will help someone else down the road.

Whil



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to