Your subject line confuses me. Do you think that they should have had the right to do this or not?
::michael Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Everybody! > > <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,352966,00.html> > > "SAN ANTONIO — Texas child welfare officials say more than half the teen > girls swept into state custody from a polygamist sect's ranch have been > pregnant. > > "Child Protective Services spokesman Darrell Azar says 53 girls between the > ages of 14 and 17 were living on the ranch in Eldorado. Of that group, 31 > already have children or are pregnant. > > "State officials took custody of all 463 children at the Yearning For Zion > Ranch more than three weeks ago after a raid prompted by calls to a domestic > violence hotline. > > "Child welfare officials say there was a pattern of underage girls forced > into "spiritual marriages" with much older men at the ranch." _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
