Ed wrote:
>Sure sounds like a continued reliance on the same raw material, even
>if the source is changed.
It's easy to sound critical with a touch of superiority if one is not
responsible for the answers. The truth is that people are working on
alternative energy sources as there would be a tremendous market for them.
They haven't found any that work on a large scale, so unless you are working on
the problem in may be best not to criticize those who are. And best not choke
our economy while waiting for what may turn out to be an impossible dream. But
keep on charging at those wind mills!
You sound as if you think we can conserve our way out of the problem... fat
chance!
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
