Ricardo Araoz wrote:
> MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
>   
>> Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
>>     
>>> All of the victims -- cough -- , I mean prisoners, are executed in 
>>> groups, but each prisoner has their own executioner.  The executioner 
>>> stands beside, and parallel to the prisoner.  At the designated time, 
>>> all prisoners are stabbed in the back with a knife.  As the prisoners 
>>> reals with backs arched from the pain, the executioners pivot their 
>>> prisoner and fire a single shot to the temple area of the head.  
>>> Immediately after a prisoners is pronounced dead, specialized teams are 
>>> rushed in to harvest organs that have have already been matched to 
>>> persons designated to receive the organs via transplant operations.
>>>
>>> It is all very well planned and organized, but the death penalty really 
>>> should be eliminated, as there are much better alternatives.
>>>       
>> Wow...those Chinese are efficient!
>>
>>     
>
> Not so. Why the stab in the back? Absolutely unnecessary, a bullet in 
> the back of the head suffices (and I'd rather have that than the macabre 
> ceremony of death by poison (lethal injection)).
>   
I definitely saw a TV show, along the lines of 60 minutes, about this 
subject.  I assume the stab to the back is to force the prisoner, who is 
in a kneeling position,  to involuntarily arch his back while tilting 
his head backwards, thus making it easier for the executioner to place a 
single shot from his pistol to the head of the prisoner.  The stab to 
the back followed by the shot to the head occur as a single move or motion.

After seeing pictures of other methods used to execute the condemned in 
China, it appears to me that there is no standardized method of capital 
punishment in China and the method used may vary from one 
location/authority to another.  There may even be summary executions in 
China for all I know.

Regards,

LelandJ
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to