On Tue, 20 May 2008 09:34:00 +0200, "Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> My point was if its part of windows (.net) then is should not need to. If
> it
> does its as bad as flash and is an add on.
> 

It's in Beta. Eventually, as more sites use it you will be prompted to
install it, like Flash or any number of other similar technologies. It
might be rolled into a Windows Update. Saying it's as bad as Flash
because you had a bad experience with Flash is confusing me. Does the
fact that it is an add-on somehow guarantee problems?
-- 
  Alan Bourke
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]



_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to