Stephen Russell wrote: > < > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/06/09/fox-anchor-calls-obama-fi_n_106027.html > > >
Good Lord, you people are really overly sensitive, aren't you? "Nothing to see here....please disperse." This reminds me of the guy on YouTube who looked like a closet serial killer just waiting to "hatch" who was telling people that they're f*cked for picking on Obama's slip about the 53 states (or whatever it was). He was all calm until the very end of his snippet when he turned frighteningly perturbed. (It definitely was a long time since that guy was laid.) I suppose if she would have rolled her eyes or smiled somewhat during the segment that would have been construed as some nefarious intention as well, eh? Does that mean that Hill thinks Obama is linked to terrorists? Good grief. Each network has staff that is either too liberal or too conservative for somebody watching. Some have more than others. MSNBC, for example, probably swings just as much (if not more) the other way on the liberal side. Are you gonna say that MSNBC gets it right moreso than FNC? Fox has some real dooschbags, but certainly fewer than some other networks. Fox doesn't have the lock on biased reporting, for sure. _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
