Ed Leafe wrote: > On Jun 15, 2008, at 10:56 PM, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote: > > >> It appears I used the correct filter tag, (eg [OT]) in the subject >> header, but the post still when to profox instead of OT for some >> reason >> unknown to me. I'll wait to repost the message until I know what went >> wrong. >> > > > Look at the source: your subject is: > > Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Re=3A_=5BOT=5D_How_Neoconservatives_Con?= > =?windows-1252?Q?qu_ered_Washington_=96_and_Launched_a_War?= > > The filter looks for "OT" surrounded by a variety of delimiters, but > it doesn't handle this. > > > -- Ed Leafe > > Thanks for the info. I cut and pasted the subject line out of the html page from the link. I had no idea the line had been encoded with special html display handling, as the subject line of the email ignored it, so it didn't show. LOL
Regards, LelandJ > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
