On Jun 16, 2008, at 12:58 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> So this was Gods way of telling Peter that a newer set of rules were
> to be
> followed.
Oh, ok. So why bother with the Old Testament, then? Over the years
they've edited the Bible so many times, why not just remove the stuff
that no longer applies? If the passages that dictate food cleanliness
no longer apply, then why are they still there?
And what's with this inconsistency? First he says that pork is bad
and slaves are OK; now he changes his mind and says the opposite? And
this is all based on some guy's dream? If I have a dream tonight that
says that clothese are evil, will you simply accept that as God's way
of telling us that yet another new set of rules are in effect, and
that he wants us all to run around naked?
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
