Actually Michael did not read the news article carefully and pulled the "banning drive throughs" out of context. The town's commissioners were trying to avoid creating a bigger traffic mess than already exists at the corner where Starbucks wants to put up a store. They are responsible for the common good. Banning was only one suggestion.
> In some ways, I have to agree with your analysis of drive-throughs. I > don't have patience for them. Unless no one is in line, I can often get > faster service by running in. In a city situation, drive throughs may be > a good response to areas with lack of adequate parking and then there is > the safety factor of not having to get out of the car. But, should Big > Brother stick his already overextended proboscus into this... HECK NO! > What used to be land of the free, home of the brave is fast becoming land > of the controlled, home of the wimps. Although I use them as my branch > offices, I would think most Starbucks customers would gladly comply, which > brings up Ann Coulters thoughts... why would I want to talk to these > people in line? Do I really want to hear about BHO, Hillarycare or global > warming fantasies? > > -- > Larry Miller > _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
