On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 7:12 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Anderson wrote:
>> Not a bad article...
>>
>> In the magazine it's titled "Developers keep FoxPro buzz alive"
>>
>> <http://www.sdtimes.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=32372>
>>
>> Bill Anderson
>
>
>  From the article:
>
> "All three noted that many of their FoxPro compatriots have begun to
> move on to .NET programming. Microsoft's strategy "has changed
> dramatically. It makes [VFP] a tough sell," Duffy offered. Consequently,
> he added, the number of developers skilled enough to support and
> maintain a FoxPro application is dwindling."
>
>
> Hmmm...at least some part of that is true.  I wonder if there really are
> hard metrics saying how many VFP devs went to DotNet or went other
> directions?  Sure...it'd be good for the M$ image to say folks have come
> to the DotNet party...and it surely might be true....but is it REALLY?
> I guess those surveys we filled out that asked "are you going to use
> DotNet within the next a) 0-3 months, b) 3-6 months, or c) 6+ months ?"
>  Get it?    <gd&r>
--------------------------------------------


hahahaha you crack me up.  For all those who left 75% probably stayed
with Visual Studio.  The other 25 probably did the java, php, big
database management, or other open source products.

Just look to YAG as a key player in VFP and what he ventured to.

-- 
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
Mimeo.com
Memphis TN

901.246-0159


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to