I agree with you William, I've been bitten so many times with low-cost servers.

When you think about it, how much money are you really saving?

 

--- On Wed, 9/3/08, William Sanders / EFG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: William Sanders / EFG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: re: [NF] Recommendations on low cost quad processor Linux server  
> w/8G+ RAM
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 10:38 PM
> Does it have to be intel based?
> 
> There's loads of Sun gear gathering dust - quad
> processors, scsi
> subsystems, raid and all that.   You can even get almost
> free licensing
> for up to 5 users, or pay for more seats..
> 
> If you don't like Sun, hey - IBM has some decent gear
> too.
> 
> My only caveat is that they are suggesting to use clone
> gear for a
> semi-production server, and I wouldn't suggest that.
> -- 
> William Sanders / efGroup
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Post Messages to: [email protected]
> Subscription Maintenance:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
> OT-free version of this list:
> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
> This message:
> http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are
> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or
> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for
> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to