Hi Everybody!

Well, Obama tried to get the Iraqi Parliament to *delay* the withdrawal 
of US troops until HE could get the credit for it, is that not carrying 
on "intercourse" with a foreign government by an unauthorized citizen?

     § 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments.

     Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without 
authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or 
carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government 
or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures 
or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, 
in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or 
to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this 
title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

     This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply 
himself, or his agent, to any foreign government, or the agents thereof, 
for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such 
government or any of its agents or subjects.

1 Stat. 613, January 30, 1799, codified at 18 U.S.C. § 953 (2004).

Oh, if you are an affirmative action type it is all right?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logan_Act
http://www.puma08.com/2008/09/19/hmmm-about-that-pesky-little-thing-called-the-logan-act/

or

http://tinyurl.com/4ys7va

P.U.M.A? People questioning Party Unity where the party is clearly off base.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to